Recent Content
Common Mistakes Beginners Make in SnapLogic (and How to Avoid Them)
SnapLogic is one of the most powerful Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) tools — designed to connect systems, transform data, and automate workflows without heavy coding. But for beginners, it’s easy to get caught up in its simplicity and make mistakes that lead to inefficient, unstable, or unmaintainable pipelines. In this post, we’ll explore the most common mistakes beginners make in SnapLogic, why they happen, and how you can avoid them with best practices. 1. Not Using the Mapper Snap Effectively ❌ The mistake: Beginners often either overuse Mapper Snaps (adding too many unnecessarily) or skip them altogether by hardcoding values inside other Snaps. 💡 Why it’s a problem: This leads to messy pipelines, inconsistent logic, and difficulties during debugging or updates. ✅ How to fix it: Use a single Mapper Snap per logical transformation. Name it meaningfully — e.g., Map_Customer_To_Salesforce. Keep transformation logic and business rules in the Mapper, not inside REST or DB Snaps. Add inline comments in expressions using // comment. 🖼 Pro tip: Think of your Mapper as the translator between systems — clean, well-organized mapping makes your entire pipeline more readable. 2. Ignoring Error Views ❌ The mistake: Leaving error views disconnected or disabled. 💡 Why it’s a problem: When a Snap fails, you lose that failed record forever — with no log or visibility. ✅ How to fix it: Always enable error views on critical Snaps (especially REST, Mapper, or File operations). Route error outputs to a File Writer or Pipeline Execute Snap for centralized error handling. Capture details like error.reason, error.entity, and error.stacktrace. 🖼 Pro tip: Create a reusable “Error Logging” sub-pipeline for consistent handling across projects. 3. Skipping Input Validation ❌ The mistake: Assuming that incoming data (from JSON, CSV, or API) is always correct. 💡 Why it’s a problem: Invalid or missing fields can cause API rejections, DB errors, or wrong transformations. ✅ How to fix it: Use Router Snap or Filter Snap to validate key fields. Example expression for email validation: $email != null && $email.match(/^[^@]+@[^@]+\.[^@]+$/) Route invalid data to a dedicated error or “review” path. 🖼 Pro tip: Centralize validation logic in a sub-pipeline for reusability across integrations. 4. Hardcoding Values Instead of Using Pipeline Parameters ❌ The mistake: Typing static values like URLs, credentials, or file paths directly inside Snaps. 💡 Why it’s a problem: When moving from Dev → Test → Prod, every Snap needs manual editing — risky and time-consuming. ✅ How to fix it: Define Pipeline Parameters (e.g., baseURL, authToken, filePath). Reference them in Snaps as $baseURL or $filePath. Use Project-level Parameters for environment configurations. 🖼 Pro tip: Maintain a single “Config Pipeline” or JSON file for all environment parameters. 5. Not Previewing Data Frequently ❌ The mistake: Running the entire pipeline without previewing data in between. 💡 Why it’s a problem: You won’t know where data transformations failed or what caused malformed output. ✅ How to fix it: Use Snap Preview after each Snap during development. Check input/output JSON to verify structure. Use the “Validate Pipeline” button before full runs. 🖼 Pro tip: Keep sample input data handy — it saves time during design and debugging. 6. Overcomplicating Pipelines ❌ The mistake: Trying to do everything in a single, lengthy pipeline. 💡 Why it’s a problem: Hard to maintain, slow to execute, and painful to debug. ✅ How to fix it: Break large flows into smaller modular pipelines. Use Pipeline Execute Snaps to connect them logically. Follow a naming pattern, e.g., 01_FetchData 02_Transform 03_LoadToTarget 🖼 Pro tip: Treat each pipeline as one clear business function. 7. Not Documenting Pipelines ❌ The mistake: No descriptions, no comments, and cryptic Snap names like “Mapper1”. 💡 Why it’s a problem: Six months later, even you won’t remember what “Mapper1” does. ✅ How to fix it: Add clear pipeline descriptions under Properties → Documentation. Use descriptive Snap names: Validate_Email, Transform_Employee_Data. Comment complex expressions in the Mapper. 🖼 Pro tip: Good documentation is as important as the pipeline itself. 8. Storing Credentials Inside Snaps ❌ The mistake: Manually entering passwords, API keys, or tokens inside REST Snaps. 💡 Why it’s a problem: It’s a major security risk and difficult to rotate credentials later. ✅ How to fix it: Use Accounts in SnapLogic Manager for authentication. Link your Snap to an Account instead of embedding credentials. Manage API tokens and passwords centrally through the Account configuration. 🖼 Pro tip: Never commit sensitive data to version control — use SnapLogic’s vault. 9. Ignoring Schema Validation Between Snaps ❌ The mistake: Assuming the output structure of one Snap always matches the next Snap’s input. 💡 Why it’s a problem: You’ll encounter “Field not found” or missing data during runtime. ✅ How to fix it: Always check Input/Output schemas in the Mapper. Use explicit field mapping instead of relying on auto-propagation. Add “safe navigation” ($?.field) for optional fields. 🖼 Pro tip: Use a JSON Formatter Snap before external APIs to verify structure. 10. Forgetting to Clean Up Temporary Data ❌ The mistake: Leaving test logs, CSVs, or temporary JSON files in the project folder. 💡 Why it’s a problem: Consumes storage and creates confusion during maintenance. ✅ How to fix it: Store temporary files in a /temp directory. Add a File Delete Snap at the end of your pipeline. Schedule cleanup jobs weekly for old files. 🎯 Final Thoughts SnapLogic makes integration development fast and intuitive — but good practices turn you from a beginner into a professional. Focus on: Clean, modular pipeline design Strong error handling Proper documentation and parameterization By avoiding these common mistakes, you’ll build SnapLogic pipelines that are scalable, secure, and easy to maintain — ready for enterprise-grade automation.
AWS SageMaker Model Integration
I am using Snaplogic to create a data set that I then write as a CSV to S3. My next step is to make a call to the SageMaker model that reads the data and writes an output file to S3. I am currently not able to execute the SageMaker model. I am attempting to use HTTP Client snap AWS Signature V4 Account Is there anything special that you did to the user account or SageMaker? Here is a screen shot of the Snap.Automating Git Commits for Untracked Assets
Hi I am trying to understand if there’s a way to automate committing untracked assets to Git. Specifically, I’d like to know Is there any public API that allows adding untracked files and committing them? Are there other recommended ways to automate Git commits in a SnapLogic pipeline or related automation setup? Any guidance examples or best practices would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, SnehaREST Get Pagination in various scenarios
Hi all, There are various challenges witnessed while using REST GET pagination. In this article, we can discuss about these challenges and how to overcome these challenges with the help of some in-build expressions in snaplogic. Let's see the various scenarios and their solution. Scenario 1: API URL response has no total records indicator, but works with limit and offset: In this case, as there are no total records that the API is going to provide in advance the only way is to navigate each of the page until the last page of the API response. The last page of the API is the page where there are no records in the response output. Explanation of how it works and Sample data: has_next condition: $entity.length > 0 has_next explanation: If the URL has n documents and it is not sure if the next page iteration is valid, the function $entity.length will check the response array length from the URL output and proceeds with the next page iteration only when the $entity.length is greater than zero. If the response array length is equal to zero, it’s evident that there are no more records to be fetched and hence the condition on has_next “$entity.length > 0” will fail and stops the next iteration loop. next_url condition: $original.URL+"?limit=" + $original.limit + "&offset=" + ( parseInt($original.limit) * snap.out.totalCount ) next_url explanation: Limit (limit parameter) and API URL values are static, but the offset value will need to change for each iteration. Hence the approach is to multiply the default limit parameter (limit) with the snap.out.totalCount function to shift the offset per API page iteration. snap.out.totalCount is the snap system variable which used to hold the total number of documents that have passed through output views of the snap. In this “REST Get”, each API page iteration response output is one json array and hence the snap.out.totalCount will be equal to the number of API page iteration completed Sample response: For First API call: { "statusLine": { "protoVersion": "HTTP/1.1", "statusCode": 200, "reasonPhrase": "OK" }, "entity": [ { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "Mark", }, { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "John", },………………. 1000 records in this array ], "original": { "effective_date": "2023-08-31", "limit": "1000", "offset": "0", "URL": "https://Url.XYZ.com" } } For Second API Call: { "statusLine": { "protoVersion": "HTTP/1.1", "statusCode": 200, "reasonPhrase": "OK" }, "entity": [ { "year": "2024", "month": "08", "Name": "Ram", }, { "year": "2021", "month": "03", "Name": "Joe", },………………. 1000 records in this array ], "original": { "effective_date": "2023-08-31", "limit": "1000", "offset": "1000" "URL": "https://Url.XYZ.com" } } Scenario 2: API URL response has total records in the response header and pagination is using limit & offset: As there are total records, the total records column in the API response can be used to traverse through the API response pages. Explanation on how it works and Sample data: has_next condition: parseInt($original.limit) * snap.out.totalCount < $headers[total-records] has_next condition explanation: If the URL Response has n documents where n is equal to total, there needs a check whether the limit is less than total records, for example: if there were 120 total records and 100 as a limit, it loops through only 2 times. It loops through as below, limit = 100, snap.out.totalCount =0: has_next condition will evaluate 0 < 120 limit = 100, snap.out.totalCount =1 has_next condition will evaluate 100 < 120 limit = 100, snap.out.totalCount =2 has_next condition will evaluate 200 < 120 pagination breaks and next page is not processed next_url condition: $original.URL+"?limit=" + $original.limit + "&offset=" + (parseInt($original.limit)* snap.out.totalCount) next_url Explanation: Limit and url values are static, but the offset value need to be derived as limit multiplied with snap.out.totalCount function. snap.out.totalCount indicates the total number of documents that have passed through all of the Snap's output views. So it will traverse next API page until the has_next condition is satisfied Sample Response: For First API call: { "statusLine": { "protoVersion": "HTTP/1.1", "statusCode": 200, "reasonPhrase": "OK" }, "entity": [ { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "Mark" }, { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "John" },….....100 records ], "original": { "effective_date": "2023-08-31", "limit": "100", "offset": "0", "URL": "https://Url.XYZ.com" } "headers": { "total-records": [ "120" ] } } For Second API Call: { "statusLine": { "protoVersion": "HTTP/1.1", "statusCode": 200, "reasonPhrase": "OK" }, "entity": [ { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "Ram" }, { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "Raj" },….....20 records ], "original": { "effective_date": "2023-08-31", "limit": "100", "offset": "100", "URL": "https://Url.XYZ.com" } "headers": { "total-records": [ "120" ] } } Scenario 3: API has no total records indicator and pagination is using page_no: The scenario here is that, there is no total records indication in the API output but API has page number as parameter. So the API pagination is possible by incrementing the page number parameter by 1 until the length of the API output array length is greater than 0, else the pagination loop need to break. Explanation on how it works and Sample data: Has-next condition: $entity.length > 0 Has-next Condition Explanation: As there is no total record count known from API output, next page of the API need to be fetched if the current page has any output elements in the output array. next-url condition: $original.URL+"&page_no= " + $headers.page_no+1 Next-Url Condition Explanation: As every document has page number in it, same can be used in the has-next condition. Sample Response: For First API call: { "statusLine": { "protoVersion": "HTTP/1.1", "statusCode": 200, "reasonPhrase": "OK" }, "entity": [ { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "Mark", }, { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "John", },………………. 1000 records in this array ], "original": { "effective_date": "2023-08-31", "URL": "https://Url.XYZ.com" }, "headers": { "page_no": 1 } } For Second API call: { "statusLine": { "protoVersion": "HTTP/1.1", "statusCode": 200, "reasonPhrase": "OK" }, "entity": [ { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "Ram", }, { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "Raj", },………………. 1000 records in this array ], "original": { "effective_date": "2023-08-31", "URL": "https://Url.XYZ.com" }, "headers": { "page_no": 2 } } Scenario 4: has total records in the response header and pagination is using page_no The scenario is there is a total records count indicator and page number in the API Url response. API next page traverse can be through incrementing page number by 1 and validate if the total records count is less than the total rows fetched so far (multiplication of snap.out.totalCount and page limit). Explanation on how it works and Sample data: Has_next condition: parseInt($original.limit) * snap.out.totalCount < $headers[total-records] Has-next Explanation: If the URL Response has n documents where n is equal to total, has_next condition is to check whether the rows fetched is less than total records, For example: if there were have 120 total records and 100 as the limit factor for the API (predefined as part of design/implementation), it loops through exactly 2 times (first and second page only). it loops through as below, limit = 100, snap.out.totalCount =0: has_next condition will evaluate 0 < 120 limit = 100, snap.out.totalCount =1 has_next condition will evaluate 100 < 120 limit = 100, snap.out.totalCount =2 has_next condition will evaluate 200 < 120 pagination breaks and next page is not processed Next-url condition: $original.URL+"&page_no= " + $headers.page_no+1 next-url explanation: As every API URL output has page number in it, same can be used in the has-next condition and also in incrementing page number to get to the next document. Sample Response: { "statusLine": { "protoVersion": "HTTP/1.1", "statusCode": 200, "reasonPhrase": "OK" }, "entity": [ { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "Mark", }, { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "John", },………………. 100 records in this array ], "original": { "effective_date": "2023-08-31", "in_limit": "100", "URL": "https://Url.XYZ.com" }, "headers": { "page_no": 1 } } For Second API call: { "statusLine": { "protoVersion": "HTTP/1.1", "statusCode": 200, "reasonPhrase": "OK" }, "entity": [ { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "Ram", }, { "year": "2022", "month": "08", "Name": "Raja", },………………. 20 records in this array ], "original": { "effective_date": "2023-08-31", "limit": "100", "URL": "https://Url.XYZ.com" }, "headers": { "page_no": 2 } } Please give us Kudos if the article helps you😍Agentic Builders Webinar Series - Integrated agentic workflows, built live, every week
Register Here>> The Agentic Builders webinar series is your step-by-step guide to designing powerful, AI-powered workflows that transform how work gets done. Across five live sessions, SnapLogic experts will show you how to connect your data, automate complex tasks, and empower teams to put AI to work across departments including: sales, finance, customer success, learning services, and revenue operations. What you’ll take away: See agentic workflows built live, integrating data sources and tools you already use. Learn how to automate high-value, high-effort tasks across your organization. Discover best practices for connecting CRM, support, LMS, and financial systems. Walk away with actionable steps to design your first (or next) agentic workflow. Starts August 28th and runs through September 25th. Explore the series!Streamlining API Development with SnapLogic's HTTP Router Snap
Overview I have created a sample pipeline named "HTTP Router Pipeline", which includes the HTTP Router Snap. A Triggered Task is configured to so the API URL can be invoked via Postman to execute pipeline. Configuring the HTTP Router In the HTTP Router Snap, we configure one request method per row, based on the various HTTP methods expected from the Triggered Task. In this demonstration, we have selected the following HTTP methods: GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE. GET Method The pipeline is designed to fetch student data from a table named studentdetails, which includes fields such as: studentid firstname lastname trainerid school email enrollmentdate trainingstatus Courseid Using the GET method, we retrieve student records based on the lastname. The request is sent via Postman, routed by the HTTP Router Snap, and processed to return the relevant records. Extract Query Parameter (lastname) Snap: Mapper Snap Purpose: Extract the lastname parameter from the query parameter. Mapping Expression: _lastName : $lastName Generic JDBC - Select Purpose: Retrieves student details from the database based on the lastName parameter. Where Clause: "lastname = '" + $.lastName + "'" Trigger GET request Trigger the GET request using Postman by passing the last name as a query parameter. POST Method The POST method is used to insert new student records into the studentdetails table. A POST request is sent via Postman to the Triggered Task. The HTTP Router routes the request to the corresponding POST path, where the incoming student data is inserted into the database. Generic JDBC - Insert Purpose: Inserts data into the studentdetails table for POST requests. Configuration: Table Name: studentdetails Trigger POST request Trigger the POST request using Postman by passing the Student details in the body. PUT Method The PUT method is used to update existing student records based on the studentid. A PUT request is sent from Postman and routed by the HTTP Router to the appropriate path. The data is then used to update the corresponding record in the studentdetails table. Generic JDBC - PUT Purpose: Updates student details in the studentdetails table for PUT requests. SQL query: "UPDATE studentdetails SET firstname = '" + $firstName + "', lastname = '" + $lastName + "' WHERE studentid = " + $studentID Trigger PUT request Trigger the PUT request using Postman by passing the Student details like firstName, lastName, studentID in the body. DELETE Method The DELETE method is used to remove a student record from the studentdetails table based on the studentid. A DELETE request is sent via Postman, routed through the HTTP Router Snap, and the targeted record is deleted from the database. Extract Query Parameter (studentid) Snap: Mapper Snap Purpose: Extract the lastname parameter from the query parameter. Mapping Expression: _studentid : $studentid Generic JDBC - Delete Purpose: Executes the DELETE query to remove a record from the studentdetails table. SQL query: "DELETE FROM studentdetails WHERE studentid = " + $studentID" Trigger DELETE request Trigger the DELETE request using Postman by passing the studentid as a query parameter.
Need Guidance on Dynamic Excel File Generation and Email Integration
Hello Team, I am currently developing an integration where the data structure in the Mapper includes an array format like [{}, {}, ...]. One of the fields, Sales Employee, contains values such as null, Andrew Johnson, and Kaitlyn Bernd. My goal is to dynamically create separate Excel files for each unique value in the Sales Employee field (including null) with all the records, and then send all the generated files as attachments in a single email. Since the employee names may vary and increase in the future, the solution needs to handle dynamic grouping and file generation. I would appreciate any expert opinions or best practices on achieving this efficiently in SnapLogic. Thanks and Regards,
