Performing an Action when there is no data
A common integration pattern is to do something when no data is received. For example, we might read a file, parse it, and find that no records meet some filter criteria. As a result, we might send a...
Forum Discussion
I tried the Sequence with a Joiner and have found the Joiner adds about 200-300ms to my pipeline, just to handle no results from a filter? Seems like a lot of overhead to overcome an issue from the filter pausing the pipeline flow. Naveen, I saw your comment on just using a router, but not sure how that would solve this if we are trying to create a single stream of data with less documents. I’d rather solve this in the source snap, but right now looking for an option that does not add a lot of overhead or pause the pipeline if the filter removes all documents. I was expecting the filter to be the bottleneck not the Joiner, if I use a union the performance is fine, but it won’t work because the first document is alway the output of sequence. Any ideas?
