Forum Discussion
5 Replies
- eric_souNew Contributor III
I think I was not clear.
Basically, I would need to Union to happen with adding a separation of level between the 2 elements unioned.Such as:
{
field1: val1
field2: val2
}
Union to
{
content: val
}Is generating the result as:
{
{field1: val1
field2: val2
}
{content:val}
}So I could refer to the first part with $.1 independantly from $.2
Does this make more sense?
Thanks,- Ajay_ChawdaContributor
Hi Eric,
Might below pipeline help you what you are trying to achieve.
testJoin_2019_04_10 (1).slp (8.3 KB)
Regards,
Ajay- eric_souNew Contributor III
Hi Ajay,
Thanks for your idea. However, this join is extending the size of the row with 2 more fields, whereas I would not like to add them carried over all the 1st generator data, as this will repeat and is useless.The idea is more to go with Union but to separate isolated data from 1st generator and 2nd.