Forum Discussion

rmedeiros's avatar
rmedeiros
New Contributor III
4 years ago

Error pipeline failing

I built an error pipeline. It works perfectly with some of the pipelines i built, but with others it won’t work. Seems like no error information is being passed to the error pipeline. What am i getti...
expression_language
transform
jason_cotterell's avatar
jason_cotterell
New Contributor
7 years ago
Copy Link

We are able to use this to move stuff from our Stage or to our Prod org (and reversed) but we do not seem to be able to move to our UAT environment, which is where we need to test our pipeline against the forced upgrade November 10th.

When we try, we get:
The requested resource at the supplied path does not exist: /SVG-UAT/projects

Any word on how to move resources to the UAT environment?

  • cjhoward18's avatar
    cjhoward18
    Employee
    6 years ago
    Copy Link

    in this case listed above does the new key need to be generated from the old keys as well?

    For the case above with your example input doc being in the variable $input here is an expression, when used in a Mapper Snap, that replicates the output:
    $input.values().join('_') mapped to target path ‘field12’ will do what you explain.

    If the key needs to be generated as well it will take a bit more logic in the expression.

    • kiko's avatar
      kiko
      New Contributor
      6 years ago
      Copy Link

      Hello, many thanks for your input. The challenge I am facing is that I can’t directly reference the target path. I will have input pairs of fields that I will need to merge and all they have in common will be the starting part of the key. Let me provide another example:

      INPUT
      { "name": "val1", "name_b": "val2", "surname": "val3", "surname_b": "val4" }

      OUTPUT
      { "name": "val1_val2", "surname": "val3_val4"}

      I am flexible to generate a new key or updating an existing one, but I can’t refer to them in the target path because in every execution the input fields will be different.

      Thanks again

      • alchemiz's avatar
        alchemiz
        Contributor III
        6 years ago
        Copy Link

        Hi Kiko,

        I did use the _ from the key name to filter it out…

        here’s the expression:

        $input.mapValues((v,k)=> !(k).contains('_') ? $input.filter((i,j)=> j.startsWith(k)).values().join('_') : null).filter((v,k)=> !(v instanceof Null))