petar_rajchinos
New Contributor III
Joined 7 years ago
User Profile
User Widgets
Contributions
Re: Documentation
Hi heidi_andrew, Just want to mention that now there is an automated way of creating documentation and providing valuable insights for your SnapLogic projects. You can find more details here https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/pete-virtual-assistant/ Let me know if you need any help.2.5KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Ultra pipeline response time
Hi @cstewart, Thank you for your response. Here is what I found in the Additional details section of the feed master node. The below image is taken from the Dashboard → Task, for the appropriate ultra task. Yes, the first execution is always bit slower which is understandable and acceptable. The other executions are faster then the first one, but a lot slower than what we expect for such a simple pipeline. Please let me know if this should be checked by the Infrastructure team and how can I get in contact from the Infrastructure team.623Views0likes0CommentsRe: Problems with Date.parse() function
Hi @rdill, I have quite similar problem while using Date.parse() function. (Sound to me that started after the new release) I have a mapper and an input value that I’m trying to parse using Date.parse(). On the dynamic preview it is showing the correct output but when on the real output it is writing NaN instead of the date value. Dynamic preview: JSON output of the same snap (same field):3.6KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Ultra pipeline response time
Hi @cstewart Thank you for your interest on this topic. Below are the answers of your questions. Extra details in the execution statistics I’m using only one instance for this test pipeline but it is not something that is heavy used. I just occasionally triggering the pipeline from Postman to test the performances. Yes, I can see in the Manager that the field ultra load balancer is populated with some address. This is running on Cloudplex. Please let me know if you need more details or if you find something that should be updated in order to improve the performance.2.2KViews0likes2CommentsUltra pipeline response time
Hi everyone, I’m testing the Ultra feature performance and I’m finding a results that are not so satisfying. Using the new release 4.22 and even the old release 4.21 (including the patches): Simple pipeline containing only JSON Generator snap with the default Hello World output, Bearer token authentication, no query parameters, no additional URL paths in the request. I’m receiving minimum response time of 900 ms (it is sometimes going up to few seconds). I have tested the same pipeline on few organizations and using two REST clients (Postman, Advanced REST Client) but the results are same. Using the older release version 4.20. Few month ago, (I believe it was March) I was testing the same pipeline configuration in Ultra mode and I was receiving minimum response time of 400 ms. I don’t believe that response time of 900 ms is acceptable for such a simple process. Are there any tips and tricks that should be applied on the nodes/snaplex to improve the performance of the pipelines running in Ultra? SnapLogic development team, Is this something that is due to some wrong configurations/setup on my environments or there is a change between the releases that is making an impact on the Ultra performance ?3.8KViews1like7CommentsRe: SnapLogic Versioning in BitBucket
Hi Sravanthi, You need to search for BitBucket REST APIs documentation and create your own project in SnapLogic. You should also read more about SnapLogic Metadata Snap Pack. For example if you want to push some pipeline to git, read that pipeline using SnapLogic Read snap and using rest api provided from BitBucket push it to the repository. Regards, Petar2.6KViews1like0CommentsRe: CSV Format incorrectly naming files input101 and input0 without file extension
Hi Chris, If that is something that was working before and as you said is a production issue that I would suggest you to contact SnapLogic support team and give the guys runtime ID (ruuid) of the process so they can check the issue. *Hot-fix: I can also give you a quick workaround solution that I hope will solve your issue. Please find the pipeline below: ZipFileNames_2019_12_17.slp (12.6 KB) In short, you can add a mapper with binary input and output right after the csv formatter and set up the mapper like this I tested this using sample pipeline (attached above) and it is working as expected. Regards, Petar2.1KViews0likes1CommentRe: Does anyone have template to move files from SFTP to AWS S3 bucket?
Hi Mayur, It really depends on what kind of files you are working with and if they have any transformation in between but the simplest process for moving the file should be just two snaps like the picture below. You can get this pipeline below: S3FileWrite_2019_12_17.slp (3.0 KB) I’m not sure if that helps but let us know if you have some issues moving the files to S3. Regards, Petar1.6KViews0likes0Comments