neeraj_jahagird
New Contributor
Joined 4 years ago
User Profile
User Widgets
Contributions
Re: Mapper behaviour
Hello @Spiro_Taleski , Please find the attached sample pipeline, that i initially started off with, which do not have any other snaps, apart from the mapper with 1-to-1 mapping. Please let me know if you need any more information. Test for array_2022_10_18.slp (4.3 KB) Thanks, NJ3.3KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Mapper behaviour
Hello @Spiro_Taleski , Thank you so much the reply! As per your suggestion, I did try to map the targets in different mappers, yet I am not receiving the desired output. Could you please let me know if you think I should consider another approach, maybe try some script? To let you know a little more, I also tried to drop the BAPI_PO_CHANGE.POITEM.item[*].NO_MORE_GR in the succeeding mapper after doing the mappings in the first mapper, yet no luck. Your inputs are highly appreciated. Thanks again. -NJ3.3KViews0likes0CommentsMapper behaviour
Hello Team, I am facing a strange situation where I am trying to map a value to a variable but it is getting over-written with another value that I haven’t mapped it . Please find the below steps. Here is the mapper, where “” value and X are getting mapped to “$BAPI_PO_CHANGE.POITEM.item[].NO_MORE_GR" and "$BAPI_PO_CHANGE.POITEMX.item[].NO_MORE_GR”, explicitly. The output that is being received is “X” being mapped to both “$BAPI_PO_CHANGE.POITEM.item[].NO_MORE_GR" and "$BAPI_PO_CHANGE.POITEMX.item[].NO_MORE_GR” Expectation : $BAPI_PO_CHANGE.POITEM.item[].NO_MORE_GR to contain value “” $BAPI_PO_CHANGE.POITEMX.item[].NO_MORE_GR to contain value X. Can someone please quickly help? Thanks in advance. Neeraj.Solved